Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
The Bombay High Court has issued a bailable warrant of Rs 25,000 against Sujata Saunik, former Additional Chief Secretary of Maharashtra, in ongoing contempt proceedings. The case relates to her alleged failure to implement a court-directed government decision.
The warrant, issued by a bench comprising Justices Ravindra V Ghuge and Ashwin D Bhobe, directs Saunik to appear before the court on November 26, 2025. The bench noted Saunik’s refusal to accept notices and obstruction of a bailiff attempting to serve the court notice, highlighting what the court described as an attitude of defiance.
The contempt case stems from a Writ Court order dated November 27, 2020, upheld by the Supreme Court, which directed the Maharashtra government to grant double salary increments to award-winning educators. The petitions were filed in 2022 by Ram Arjunrao Shete, Anil Vasantrao Palande, and other teachers, citing the state’s failure to implement the order.
Previously, the High Court had criticised Saunik for attempting to have a subordinate officer tender an apology on her behalf, which was seen as a disregard for judicial authority.
The bench also addressed the delayed issuance of the contempt notice, which was processed only after Saunik’s retirement on June 30, 2025. An internal inquiry identified Section Officer Aditya P Satghare as responsible for the lapse, and the court permitted the Registrar to initiate disciplinary action against him.
The matter is scheduled for further hearing on November 26, 2025, when Saunik is expected to respond to the contempt proceedings.
6
Published: Oct 18, 2025