Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
The Delhi High Court has refused to grant additional time to Rajpal Yadav in a cheque bounce case involving dues of Rs 6 crore.
The court took a firm stance, rejecting his request for a 30-day extension and making it clear that further delays would not be entertained.
During the hearing, the bench led by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma strongly criticised Rajpal Yadav’s conduct in the case.
The court observed that:
The judge emphasized that such behaviour cannot be accepted in legal proceedings.
In a sharp remark, the court stated that no further time would be granted, underlining its strict approach.
The case has now reached a critical stage, with the court reserving its judgment after hearing arguments.
Cheque bounce cases fall under financial and criminal law provisions, and non-compliance can lead to serious consequences, including penalties and legal action.
The dispute involving Rajpal Yadav revolves around payment obligations linked to a settlement amount of Rs 6 crore.
The court’s decision highlights the importance of accountability and timely compliance in financial disputes. It sends a strong message that delays and shifting positions will not be tolerated.
With the court reserving its judgment, the next phase will determine the final outcome of the case. The decision could have legal and financial implications for the actor.
5
Published: 2h ago