Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
The US House of Representatives has narrowly approved a $95 billion Republican-backed budget proposal aimed at funding military operations related to the conflict with Iran, along with several key priorities of President Donald Trump's administration.
The measure passed by a 216-214 vote, with support coming exclusively from Republican lawmakers while every Democrat voted against the proposal.
The legislation now moves to the Senate, where divisions within the Republican Party could make its path to approval significantly more challenging.
The proposed funding package allocates billions of dollars across defence, national security and domestic priorities supported by the Trump administration.
According to the proposal, the package includes:
House Republican leaders argue the funding is necessary to maintain military readiness and support American forces deployed overseas.
The budget debate comes as lawmakers remain divided over the United States' military involvement in Iran.
While Congress has debated funding for military operations, disagreements continue over the scope of presidential war powers and whether lawmakers should formally authorise the use of military force.
The proposal has therefore become a focal point in the wider political debate over national security, defence spending and congressional oversight.
Democratic lawmakers strongly opposed the legislation, arguing that billions of dollars allocated for military operations should instead be directed toward domestic programmes.
Critics said the package overlooks issues such as reducing the cost of living, healthcare and assistance for American families.
They also questioned the decision to advance major war-related funding without broader bipartisan consensus.
Although House Republicans ultimately passed the proposal, several members of the party raised concerns over the legislation.
Some fiscal conservatives argued the package lacks sufficient spending reductions to offset its overall cost, while others called for greater congressional involvement in decisions related to military operations.
The vote highlighted differing views within the Republican Party on government spending and defence policy.
The proposal's future now rests with the US Senate, where Republican lawmakers remain divided on several aspects of the legislation.
Issues under debate include:
Senate leaders have not yet indicated whether the House proposal will receive enough support to advance in its current form.
The House vote marks another effort by Republican leadership to use the budget reconciliation process, which allows certain legislation to pass the Senate with a simple majority rather than the usual 60-vote threshold.
Supporters view the approach as a practical way to advance the administration's agenda, while opponents argue it limits bipartisan debate on major policy decisions.
With Senate negotiations expected in the coming weeks, the future of the package remains uncertain.
The House passed a $95 billion Republican-backed budget proposal funding military operations, national security programmes and other administration priorities.
The proposal passed by 216 votes to 214.
The package includes funding for the Pentagon, national security programmes, agricultural assistance and election-related measures.
Democrats argue the funds should instead be directed toward domestic priorities such as lowering costs for Americans and supporting social programmes.
The legislation will now be considered by the US Senate, where it faces an uncertain path due to divisions among Republican lawmakers.
The proposal combines military funding with several major domestic policy priorities, making it one of the most closely watched budget measures before Congress.
4
Published: 1h ago