Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
The National Testing Agency (NTA) has strongly rejected allegations of discrepancies in the NEET UG 2026 examination results, claiming that several OMR answer sheets circulated on social media were digitally manipulated and AI-generated to falsely suggest errors in the evaluation process.
In a detailed clarification issued on Monday, the examination authority said it examined multiple complaints and found that several publicly shared OMR sheets did not match the original records stored in its secure database.
The NTA has also warned that candidates found creating or circulating fabricated documents may face criminal proceedings, cancellation of candidature, and debarment from future examinations.
The controversy began shortly after the NEET UG Re-Test 2026 results were announced, when several candidates claimed that their final scores did not match the marks they had calculated using the official answer key.
The issue first gained attention following complaints from candidates in Maharashtra's Beed district, where students alleged discrepancies between their expected marks and official scorecards.
Soon, similar allegations emerged from other parts of the country, with candidates posting images of their OMR sheets online and claiming that their responses had either been altered or incorrectly evaluated.
As concerns grew, the NTA initiated a verification process to compare the circulated documents with its official examination records.
According to the agency, forensic analysis indicated that several OMR sheets shared online had been modified using AI-based image editing and OCR (Optical Character Recognition) tools.
The NTA alleged that manipulated documents contained:
The agency maintained that such alterations cannot affect its official records because all original answer sheets are protected through multiple security features.
The NTA explained that every original OMR sheet is linked to secure server-side records and contains several authentication mechanisms, including:
According to the agency, these records remain securely stored and cannot be modified using edited images or external software.
To address public concerns, the NTA released detailed clarifications regarding five cases that gained significant attention online.
The agency stated that the OMR sheet available in its records contained the candidate's verified personal details, signatures, and authentication marks.
According to the NTA, the image circulated online included the identity details of another individual whose information did not exist in the NEET UG 2026 database.
The NTA rejected allegations of incorrect evaluation, stating that the circulated OMR sheet had been digitally altered.
The agency maintained that her verified official score remained 38 marks.
The candidate had claimed that only five questions were left unanswered.
However, the NTA said its official records showed 44 unattempted questions, with a verified score of 164 marks.
According to the NTA, additional answer bubbles had been digitally shaded in the version shared online.
The original OMR reflected 54 attempted questions, resulting in an official score of 116 marks.
The agency alleged that the circulated OMR sheet contained altered details, including changes to the invigilator's signing time.
The NTA maintained that her verified official score remained 167 marks.
The examination authority has cautioned candidates and the public against circulating fabricated documents or misleading information regarding NEET UG 2026 results.
The agency stated that individuals found creating or sharing manipulated OMR sheets may face:
The authority reiterated that only records stored in its official server database will be considered valid during any review or grievance redressal process.
The NTA responded to allegations of score discrepancies and OMR mismatches by stating that several documents circulating online were digitally manipulated and did not match official records.
Yes. The agency claimed forensic analysis indicated that some OMR sheets had been digitally edited using AI-based and OCR-based tools.
According to the agency, every OMR sheet is protected through barcodes, QR codes, booklet numbers, candidate signatures, thumb impressions, invigilator signatures, and secure server-side storage.
The NTA has warned that individuals found circulating fabricated documents may face criminal proceedings, cancellation of candidature, and debarment from future examinations.
The agency issued detailed clarifications regarding five cases that had gained attention on social media and in public discussions.
No. The NTA stated that official evaluation is based solely on original server-side records, which cannot be altered using edited or AI-generated images.
Candidates should use the official grievance redressal mechanism provided by the NTA and submit only authentic documents for verification.
5
Published: 7h ago