Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
Fresh concerns have emerged over the NEET UG 2026 re-examination results after a medical aspirant from Kanpur alleged that her score changed multiple times on the National Testing Agency (NTA) portal within a few hours of the result declaration.
The candidate, Arya Singh, claims that based on her OMR sheet, she expected to score 609 marks. However, she alleges that the result portal first displayed 540 marks, which later dropped to 167 marks.
The allegations have sparked renewed debate over the transparency of the NEET evaluation process, with affected candidates seeking an official investigation.
According to Arya Singh, the OMR sheet uploaded by the NTA on July 13 initially contained an incorrect sequence of questions.
After comparing her responses, she calculated that her expected score should be 609 marks.
She submitted an objection through the NTA's challenge portal, pointing out the alleged discrepancy in the question order.
Arya claims the NTA later uploaded a revised OMR sheet with the corrected sequence. However, she alleges that the revised document still reflected incorrect marks.
Arya alleges that when the NEET UG 2026 re-test results were declared on the night of July 16, the NTA portal initially displayed a score of 540 marks.
According to her, while repeatedly refreshing the website, the displayed score changed again around 2 am, falling to 167 marks.
The result currently available on the portal reportedly shows:
She believes the discrepancy could be due to either a technical glitch or an evaluation error.
Arya has submitted formal complaints to both the National Testing Agency and the Ministry of Education.
According to her, she has attached:
She has requested a detailed investigation into the matter.
The candidate has also stated that if no action is taken, she intends to escalate the issue to the offices of the President of India, the Prime Minister, and the Chief Minister.
The report also mentions another candidate, Aarushi Patel from Ayodhya, who has alleged that her score changed after the results were published.
According to her, the marks initially displayed on the portal were reduced the following day.
These allegations have further intensified demands for greater transparency in the NEET evaluation process.
Arya stated that this was her second attempt at the NEET examination.
She claimed she had experienced similar concerns during NEET 2025 but was unable to challenge the result at that time due to a lack of documentary evidence.
This year, she says she has preserved all relevant records to support her claims.
The controversy comes shortly after the NTA released the NEET UG 2026 re-test results.
The agency has recently rejected allegations regarding manipulated OMR sheets circulating online, stating that some disputed documents were digitally altered or AI-generated. It has also warned of legal action against those submitting fabricated documents.
However, the NTA has not yet publicly responded to Arya Singh's specific allegations regarding the changes in her score.
Whether the discrepancy resulted from a technical issue, an evaluation error or another factor remains unclear and may only be determined after an official inquiry.
A medical aspirant from Kanpur has alleged that her NEET UG 2026 score changed multiple times on the NTA portal, despite her OMR sheet indicating a much higher expected score.
According to the candidate, her expected score was 609, the portal initially showed 540, and later displayed 167.
As of now, the National Testing Agency has not publicly responded to Arya Singh's specific claims.
The report mentions another candidate from Ayodhya who has also alleged changes in her NEET UG 2026 score after the results were published.
She has filed complaints with the NTA and the Ministry of Education and says she may approach higher constitutional authorities if the issue remains unresolved.
7
Published: 20h ago