Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
Yashwant Varma has withdrawn from the ongoing impeachment inquiry initiated by a parliamentary panel.
In a formal communication, he informed the committee about his decision to step away from the proceedings.
Justice Varma criticised the investigation, stating that it was based on “suggestions, imputations and presumptions” rather than concrete evidence.
He raised concerns about the fairness and legal validity of the inquiry process.
The judge also alleged that he had been subjected to a “deliberate vilification campaign.”
He argued that despite serious allegations, there has been no direct evidence presented against him so far.
The case stems from an incident in March 2025, when cash was reportedly recovered from his residence while he was serving at the Delhi High Court.
Following the controversy, he was transferred to the Allahabad High Court, which further intensified scrutiny around the case.
The development has brought attention to the impeachment mechanism for judges in India.
It raises questions about procedural transparency, evidence standards, and the balance between accountability and fairness.
The case could have broader implications for judicial independence and the functioning of oversight mechanisms.
Experts believe the outcome may influence how similar cases are handled in the future.
The controversy has sparked debate across legal and political circles, with opinions divided over the merits of the case and the conduct of the inquiry.
With Justice Varma stepping back, the focus now shifts to how the parliamentary panel proceeds.
The case is expected to remain under close observation in the coming weeks.
5
Published: 1h ago