Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
Two listed companies belonging to the Kalyani Group have settled regulatory proceedings with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) after allegations related to fund diversion and questionable related-party transactions. The regulator accepted a settlement amount exceeding ₹4.12 crore, while the companies resolved the matter without admitting or denying any wrongdoing.
The case involved Kalyani Steels Limited and BF Utilities Ltd, both linked to industrialists Baba Kalyani and Amit Kalyani. SEBI initiated proceedings after reviewing an examination report submitted by the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) on March 20, 2023.
According to the regulatory order, the NSE report observed that multiple listed companies within the group had invested in promoter-linked entities that showed “nil operations” and negative net worth. Several of these investments were impaired either within the same financial year or shortly thereafter.
The regulator noted that the utilisation of funds by these entities appeared suspicious. Funds were reportedly routed through multi-layered investments into potentially indirectly linked entities in India and overseas under various project names.
SEBI’s investigation covered the period from FY 2009–10 to FY 2021–22 and examined investments, loans, and advances made by Kalyani Steels to related entities, including BF Utilities.
The probe found that Kalyani Steels invested approximately ₹219.5 crore across five group entities:
₹136 crore in DGM Realties Pvt Ltd
₹77.17 crore in Lord Ganesha Minerals Pvt Ltd
₹4.02 crore in Kalyani Mining Ventures Pvt Ltd
₹1.32 crore in Kalyani Natural Resources Pvt Ltd
₹1.005 crore in Kalyani Mukand Ltd
Out of the total investments, around ₹74.5 crore was later impaired.
SEBI determined that these entities qualified as related parties due to common control exercised by Baba Kalyani and Amit Kalyani. BF Utilities and the compliance officer and company secretary of Kalyani Steels were also examined as part of the proceedings.
An adjudicating officer was appointed in April 2024. In June 2024, the companies filed a settlement application proposing to resolve the matter without admitting or denying the findings.
SEBI accepted the settlement, and the payment of ₹4.12 crore was remitted on February 12, 2026.
The settlement order clarified that the relief is not absolute. The regulator retains the authority to reopen or initiate proceedings if any representation is found to be false, settlement conditions are breached, or discrepancies emerge later.
The case highlights regulatory scrutiny over related-party transactions and financial transparency, reinforcing the importance of corporate governance and disclosure standards in India’s capital markets.
2
Published: 2h ago