Supreme Court Acquits Mother-in-Law in Dowry Harassment Case, Says “Word Spreads Faster Than Wind”

The Supreme Court on Friday acquitted a woman accused of dowry harassment, observing that “word spreads faster than the wind” in such cases, and ruled that the prosecution failed to establish evidence beyond doubt.

A bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria delivered the judgment while allowing an appeal against the Uttarakhand High Court’s order, which had upheld the woman’s conviction and a three-year sentence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The case dates back to June 2001, when the father of the deceased filed a complaint alleging his pregnant daughter had died by suicide inside her matrimonial home after being harassed for dowry by her mother-in-law. The father claimed his daughter had informed the family about sarcastic remarks and taunts related to dowry demands.

Initially, the trial court acquitted the woman’s husband and other family members, but convicted the mother-in-law under Section 498-A, which pertains to cruelty inflicted on a married woman by her husband or his relatives. The high court later affirmed the conviction.

During the proceedings, the Supreme Court took note of a neighbor’s testimony, which asserted that the accused had never demanded dowry. The bench criticized lower courts for dismissing this testimony on the assumption that dowry demands occur only “within the four walls” of a home.

“In such matters, the word spreads faster than the wind about a daughter-in-law being harassed for dowry by her parents-in-law,” the bench remarked, highlighting that social circles often become aware of such issues quickly.

The court further stated that while any demand for dowry constitutes grounds for invoking Section 498-A, the evidence presented in this case did not inspire confidence. The bench concluded there was no conclusive proof linking the accused to the alleged harassment that led to the woman’s death.

Setting aside the high court’s order, the apex court acquitted the mother-in-law, emphasizing that conviction cannot rest on assumptions or weak circumstantial evidence.