Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
The texts surfaced as part of legal proceedings connected to Lively’s allegations of workplace misconduct against Baldoni during the making of the film. While Reynolds is not a party to the lawsuit, the language used in his private messages has attracted significant attention after being cited in court filings.
According to documents now in the public domain, Reynolds expressed frustration and anger over how events unfolded during the film’s successful theatrical run. In several messages, he appeared to criticise Baldoni’s handling of the situation and voiced concern that Lively was facing reputational damage at a time when her professional achievements should have been celebrated.
Following the release of the messages, Reynolds’ representative issued a statement defending the actor’s actions. The spokesperson said Reynolds’ involvement stemmed from his role as a husband supporting his wife during what was described as an emotionally and professionally challenging period. The statement emphasised that Reynolds believed Lively was attempting to address workplace concerns privately and responsibly, only to face what he viewed as pushback and negative narratives.
The representative also asserted that Reynolds felt strongly about the broader issue of workplace safety and accountability, stating that he stood firmly behind the principle of creating environments free from harassment and retaliation. According to the statement, Reynolds did not regret supporting Lively and believed his response was justified given the circumstances.
The unsealed messages reportedly include sharply worded criticism of Baldoni, reflecting Reynolds’ perception of events at the time. These remarks, though private in origin, have now become central to public discourse after their inclusion in legal documents.
Baldoni’s legal team has rejected the allegations outright. His lawyer responded by stating that the evidence does not substantiate the claims made against Baldoni and argued that internal communications and testimonies contradict the accusations. The defence has maintained that the controversy has been mischaracterised and that the legal process will ultimately clarify the facts.
While a countersuit filed by Baldoni was dismissed earlier, the primary legal case involving Lively remains unresolved. As proceedings continue, the controversy has extended beyond the courtroom, drawing attention to issues of celebrity, workplace conduct, and the impact of private communications becoming public.
The situation has placed renewed focus on how disputes in the entertainment industry unfold under intense public scrutiny, with personal messages now shaping narratives alongside formal legal arguments.
12
Published: Jan 28, 2026