A NEET-UG 2026 candidate has moved the Delhi High Court, alleging serious irregularities in the evaluation process conducted by the National Testing Agency> (NTA).

The petition claims that the student's score displayed on the official NTA results portal changed three times within 24 hours, prompting him to seek judicial intervention.

Filed through advocate Vineet Jindal, the plea seeks production and preservation of the candidate's original physical OMR answer sheet along with related electronic examination records for independent verification.

Alleged Score Changes on NTA Portal

According to the petition, the student appeared for the NEET-UG examination on June 21, 2026.

After comparing his responses with the provisional and final answer keys, he estimated that he should receive around 620 marks.

However, the petition alleges the following sequence of events after results were declared:

• The NTA portal initially displayed 650 marks.
• After logging in again, the score allegedly changed to 500 marks.
• By the following day, the displayed score had reportedly dropped to 135 marks.

The petitioner claims that no explanation has been provided by the NTA for these alleged changes.

Candidate Disputes OMR Sheet

Following the score discrepancy, the student submitted multiple email representations to the NTA and also filed an application under the Right to Information (RTI) Act seeking records related to his evaluation.

According to the petition, he later visited the NTA office in New Delhi, where officials showed him an OMR sheet on a computer screen.

The student alleges that:

• The displayed OMR sheet was not the one he filled during the examination.
• He immediately disputed its authenticity.
• Officials informed him that it was the only OMR sheet available in the agency's records.
• The same copy was later emailed to him.

These allegations are contained in the petition and have not been adjudicated by the court.

Petition Raises Questions Over Examination Records

The plea also points to what it describes as an error in a calculation sheet supplied by the NTA.

According to the petitioner, the document reportedly mentioned the examination date as July 21, 2026, instead of June 21, 2026, when the examination was conducted.

The petitioner argues that this discrepancy raises concerns regarding the reliability of the records maintained by the agency.

Relief Sought Before the Court

The petition clarifies that the candidate is not seeking re-evaluation of his answers.

Instead, he has requested the court to direct the NTA to:

• Produce and preserve the original physical OMR answer sheet.
• Preserve server logs, scanning logs, audit trails and metadata related to the examination.
• Permit him to participate in the ongoing NEET-UG 2026 counselling process, subject to the outcome of the case.
• Appoint an independent forensic expert, laboratory or Court Commissioner to examine the original OMR sheet and digital records.

The matter is expected to come up before the Delhi High Court on Friday.

NTA Yet to Respond in Court

At the time of filing of the petition, the allegations represented the petitioner's claims before the court.

The National Testing Agency is expected to present its response during the judicial proceedings, and the court has not made any findings on the merits of the allegations.

Why This Matters

The case raises important questions about transparency, record preservation and confidence in large-scale competitive examinations. As millions of candidates rely on digital evaluation systems, courts may examine whether adequate safeguards exist to ensure the integrity of examination records. The outcome of the proceedings could have broader implications for the handling of disputes involving digital examination data.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Why has the student approached the Delhi High Court?

The student alleges that his NEET-UG 2026 score changed multiple times on the NTA portal and disputes the authenticity of the OMR sheet shown to him.

Is the student seeking re-evaluation?

No. According to the petition, he is seeking verification of the original physical OMR sheet and related electronic records rather than re-evaluation of his answers.

What records does the petition seek?

The plea seeks preservation of the original OMR sheet, server logs, scanning logs, audit trails, metadata and other examination records.

Has the Delhi High Court ruled on the matter?

No. The matter is expected to be heard, and the court has not yet examined or ruled on the allegations.

Has the NTA responded?

The article does not mention any formal response from the NTA regarding the allegations. The agency is expected to present its position during the court proceedings.