Imran Masood Questions Terror Probe After Lashkar Operatives’ Arrest in Delhi

Congress MP Imran Masood has stirred political debate after questioning the credibility of terror investigations following the arrest of eight suspected operatives linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba in an alleged conspiracy targeting Hindu temples in Delhi.

The suspects were remanded to seven days of police custody after investigators claimed to have foiled a major terror plot. Authorities described the operation as a significant breakthrough, alleging the group conducted reconnaissance of several temples in the national capital and stored related footage on mobile devices.

Masood raises concerns about wrongful arrests

Reacting to the arrests, Masood said that investigations in terror cases must be approached with caution and accountability. He claimed that innocent individuals have in the past spent decades in prison before being acquitted and asked what action was taken against those responsible for alleged wrongful imprisonment.

He argued that due process must be followed and accountability should extend to officials if individuals are wrongly implicated. His remarks have triggered debate on investigative procedures and civil liberties in national security cases.

Masood also suggested that in sensitive cases, it is difficult to immediately determine the full truth, emphasising the importance of thorough investigation and judicial oversight.

Police claim major terror plot foiled

Delhi Police stated that the arrested individuals were part of a terror module allegedly linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba. Investigators believe the group operated under instructions from handlers based outside India, including a Bangladesh-based coordinator with alleged links to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence and senior LeT leadership.

According to police sources, the suspects conducted detailed reconnaissance of multiple temples in Delhi. Authorities reportedly recovered videos and digital evidence from mobile phones seized during the arrests.

Officials described the case as a cross-border terror network with operational planning aimed at high-impact targets.

Debate intensifies over security and civil liberties

Masood’s comments have triggered sharp reactions across political and security circles. Supporters argue that safeguarding civil liberties and preventing wrongful incarceration are essential in a democratic system. Others emphasise the need to trust investigative agencies and prioritise national security.

The remarks have reignited discussions about balancing counterterrorism efforts with legal safeguards and accountability mechanisms.

Investigation continues

Authorities continue to interrogate the suspects and analyse digital evidence to determine the scope of the alleged network and potential threats. Further details are expected as the investigation progresses.

The incident has once again highlighted the complexity of counterterrorism operations, the importance of due process, and the political sensitivities that often accompany national security cases.