Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
A major political controversy has erupted in Odisha after a remark made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey linking former Chief Minister Biju Patnaik to the CIA. The statement has triggered strong reactions across the state, with leaders and supporters expressing outrage over the claim.
The issue quickly escalated into a political flashpoint, drawing sharp criticism from multiple quarters and intensifying tensions between political parties.
BJD president and former Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik strongly condemned the remark, calling it “outrageous.” He stated that such comments were unacceptable and criticised the BJP MP for making unverified claims about a respected leader.
In a sharp response, Patnaik said that the remark reflected poor judgment and should not have been made, especially when referring to a prominent freedom fighter and former leader of the state.
The controversy began after Nishikant Dubey claimed that Biju Patnaik had acted as a link between former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and the CIA during the 1960s war with China.
The claim has been widely rejected by political leaders and observers, who have questioned its credibility and intent. Many see the remark as an attempt to draw historical figures into present-day political narratives.
The statement has led to widespread backlash across Odisha, where Biju Patnaik is remembered as a respected leader and a symbol of pride. Political leaders from the Biju Janata Dal (BJD) and other groups have strongly criticised the BJP MP for making such remarks.
Several leaders have termed the statement as an insult to the legacy of Biju Patnaik, demanding an apology and accountability.
In response to the controversy, BJD MP Sasmit Patra resigned from a parliamentary committee headed by Nishikant Dubey. The move highlights the seriousness of the issue and the growing political tension surrounding the statement.
Other MPs, including Manas Mangaraj, Subhasish Khuntia, Muzibulla Khan, and Niranjan Bishi, also criticised the remarks, calling them disrespectful and inappropriate.
Senior party leaders have echoed similar sentiments, demanding that the BJP MP withdraw his statement and issue a public apology.
The controversy has also reignited debates over the interpretation of historical events and the use of such narratives in current political discourse.
Experts believe that bringing historical figures into political debates without verified evidence can lead to misinformation and unnecessary controversy.
As the situation continues to unfold, the political fallout from the remark is expected to persist. The issue has not only affected party relations but has also sparked broader discussions about respect for historical figures and responsible political communication.
4
Published: 1h ago