Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has stayed the interim anticipatory bail granted to Pawan Khera in a case registered by Assam Police.
The case stems from a complaint filed by Riniki Bhuyan Sarma, who is the spouse of Himanta Biswa Sarma.
Earlier, the Telangana High Court had granted Khera a one-week anticipatory bail, allowing him time to approach the appropriate legal forum.
The relief was seen as temporary protection, ensuring that he could seek further legal remedies without immediate arrest.
The Supreme Court’s decision came after Assam Police challenged the Telangana High Court’s order.
The key argument presented was:
???? The Telangana High Court lacked jurisdiction since the case was registered in Assam.
Accepting this contention, the apex court paused the interim relief, effectively reopening the legal battle for Khera.
The controversy originates from allegations made by Pawan Khera against Riniki Bhuyan Sarma.
Khera had claimed that:
These claims led to a police case being registered against him.
This case has both legal and political significance:
The Supreme Court’s intervention signals that procedural correctness will be strictly enforced.
With the interim bail now paused:
The case underscores a key legal principle:
Jurisdiction plays a crucial role in granting anticipatory bail
Courts must ensure that relief is granted within proper legal boundaries, especially in interstate cases.
31
Published: Apr 15, 2026