Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke has questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi over whether legal cases against student protesters will also be withdrawn after the Prime Minister said he had forgiven those who used abusive language against him during recent protests.
The exchange comes amid an ongoing political debate over police action against students involved in demonstrations over alleged examination paper leaks and education-related issues.
Dipke Responds to PM Modi's Instagram Video
Prime Minister Narendra Modi shared another video on Instagram, saying he had forgiven the students who used abusive language against him during the protests.
Responding in the comments section, Dipke wrote:
"Sirf reel par hi maaf karoge ya cases bhi vapas loge?"
(Will you forgive them only in a reel, or will you also withdraw the cases?)
The post marked another public exchange between the Prime Minister and the CJP founder, who has repeatedly criticised the government's handling of the protests.
PM Modi Calls for Forgiveness
In his video, the Prime Minister addressed the abusive slogans and remarks made during the protests, saying such language had crossed the limits of civil discourse.
He stated that while he and even his late mother had been subjected to abusive remarks, punishment and prolonged legal proceedings would not resolve the underlying issues.
Instead, he said he wished to forgive those involved and encouraged society to guide young people rather than merely punish them.
Earlier Remarks on Anti-Paper Leak Law
The latest video follows another Instagram message released a day earlier in which the Prime Minister welcomed the passage of the amended anti-paper leak legislation aimed at strengthening action against examination fraud.
Reacting to that video, Dipke had posted another sarcastic remark questioning the government's priorities.
Cases Against Students Become New Flashpoint
Following the resignation of the Union Education Minister amid the wider examination controversy, legal action against student protesters has become a major point of disagreement between the government and the CJP.
Dipke and other party leaders have alleged that students are being harassed through criminal cases and have warned of further protests if their demands are not addressed.
According to the CJP, action against students could discourage democratic participation and peaceful protest.
Several FIRs Withdrawn, Others Continue
While several state governments have reportedly withdrawn FIRs against student protesters, authorities continue to pursue cases involving individuals with previous criminal records.
The matter has also drawn judicial attention after the Supreme Court directed states to release minors and individuals without criminal antecedents who were detained during the protests.
Zero FIR Against Teen Sparks Debate
The controversy intensified after a Zero FIR was registered against a 15-year-old from Noida over allegedly abusive remarks directed at the Prime Minister during a protest.
The case was later transferred to the Delhi Police.
The teenager subsequently released a public apology, saying she had been influenced by slogans raised around her and described the incident as her "first and last mistake."
CJP Raises Free Speech Concerns
CJP leaders have argued that while abusive language should not be encouraged, criminal prosecution over such remarks could have a chilling effect on freedom of expression.
Dipke has also questioned whether similar legal action has been taken in past instances involving controversial remarks by political leaders, alleging unequal application of the law.
The issue continues to generate political debate as discussions around student protests, accountability and freedom of speech remain in focus.
Key Highlights
- PM Modi said he had forgiven students who used abusive language during protests.
- CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke questioned whether cases against protesters would also be withdrawn.
- Student protest-related FIRs have become a fresh political flashpoint.
- A Zero FIR against a teenager from Noida has triggered renewed debate.
- The Supreme Court has issued directions regarding minors and individuals without criminal records detained during the protests.
- The issue has intensified discussions on free speech and legal action during public protests.
FAQs
Why did Abhijeet Dipke respond to PM Modi?
Dipke questioned whether the government's legal cases against student protesters would also be withdrawn after the Prime Minister said he had forgiven those who abused him.
What did PM Modi say in his video?
The Prime Minister said abusive language does not solve problems and expressed his willingness to forgive the students instead of seeking punishment.
What is the controversy over student protest cases?
The debate centres on FIRs filed against protesters following demonstrations over examination-related issues, with opposition groups demanding that cases be withdrawn.
What is a Zero FIR?
A Zero FIR allows a police station to register a complaint regardless of where the alleged offence took place before transferring it to the appropriate jurisdiction.
Has the Supreme Court issued any directions?
Yes. The Supreme Court directed states to release minors and individuals without criminal antecedents who were detained during the protests.
Prev Article
Kerala Rains: 3 Dead as Landslides, Floods Batter Idukki, Kottayam; Red Alert Issued
Next Article
Assam Floods Death Toll Rises to 82, Nearly 1.93 Lakh People Still Affected Across Five Districts