Congress Criticises MP Govt’s Krishna-Themed Schemes in Budget 2026

A political debate has erupted in Madhya Pradesh after the state government introduced two welfare schemes named after references from the life of Lord Krishna in its 2026–27 budget. The initiatives, titled Dwarika and Yashoda Milk, were announced as part of the state’s ₹4.38 lakh crore budget and have drawn sharp criticism from the opposition Congress, which called the move “undemocratic” and politically motivated.

The schemes were unveiled by Finance Minister Jagdish Deora during the budget presentation under the leadership of Chief Minister Mohan Yadav. The names are inspired by figures and places associated with Lord Krishna — Yashoda being his foster mother and Dwarka the kingdom he is believed to have established.

Under the Yashoda Milk scheme, the state government plans to supply milk as part of the mid-day meal programme in schools, aiming to improve nutrition levels among children. The Dwarika scheme focuses on strengthening urban infrastructure and supporting rapid urban development across the state.

Officials stated that approximately ₹5,000 crore will be invested through the Dwarika initiative over the next three years to support urban expansion and development. The government has also allocated significant funds for the Yashoda Milk Supply scheme to enhance child nutrition and support public health objectives.

The announcement, however, triggered criticism from the Indian National Congress. Party leaders questioned the intent behind naming government programmes after a Hindu deity, arguing that such decisions could send the wrong message in a diverse and multi-religious society.

Congress leader Phool Singh Baraiya stated that linking public welfare schemes with religious symbolism may not reflect the inclusive spirit of governance. He also alleged that the ruling party was politicising sensitive issues for electoral advantage.

In response, leaders from the ruling party defended the decision, stating that the names honour India’s cultural heritage and traditions. Cabinet Minister Gautam Tetwal said the schemes pay tribute to the country’s civilisational roots and emphasised that there is no controversy in recognising cultural symbols that resonate with people.

The exchange highlights the continuing political divide over the role of cultural and religious symbolism in public policy. While the government maintains that the schemes aim to improve urban infrastructure and child nutrition, opposition voices stress the importance of keeping welfare initiatives culturally neutral in a pluralistic society.

The debate has also sparked broader public discussion about governance, identity, and inclusivity in policy branding. As the state moves forward with implementation, the focus will remain on the schemes’ impact on urban development and child nutrition outcomes.