Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
In a rare example of administrative integrity, a Booth Level Officer (BLO) in West Bengal has won widespread praise after strictly following procedure under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls — even when it meant serving an official notice to his own wife.
Debshankar Chattopadhyay, a government school teacher posted as a BLO, was carrying out his duties as part of the voter list revision exercise initiated by the Election Commission of India. During the verification process, he received a list of electors who were required to appear for a hearing to resolve discrepancies in their voter records.
While carefully cross-checking the names, Debshankar was surprised to find both his own name and that of his wife, Anindita Chattopadhyay, included in the list.
According to officials, the system flagged discrepancies in both entries. In Debshankar’s case, his name was incorrectly spelt due to a data entry error. In his wife’s voter record, a major anomaly was detected — a 50-year age gap was shown between her and her father, triggering automatic scrutiny under SIR norms.
Such inconsistencies require mandatory hearings, during which electors must clarify and submit corrected details to ensure accuracy in the electoral roll.
Instead of seeking any exemption or special handling, Debshankar followed the rulebook strictly. As required under protocol, he visited his residence and formally handed over the hearing notice to his wife.
Though initially taken aback, Anindita later expressed appreciation for her husband’s commitment to his responsibilities.
“I was shocked at first, but I am proud that he followed the rules without hesitation,” she said. “He did what any honest officer should do.”
The incident quickly drew attention in the neighbourhood, with residents praising Debshankar for placing duty above personal convenience. Many described the act as a reminder of how grassroots election officials play a crucial role in safeguarding democratic processes.
Local residents said such examples help restore public faith in election-related exercises, especially amid heightened political scrutiny of voter list revisions.
The Special Intensive Revision is a nationwide exercise aimed at correcting errors, removing duplicates, and ensuring only eligible voters are included. West Bengal is among the states where the process has drawn attention, with claims, objections, and hearings underway ahead of upcoming elections.
Election officials maintain that the process is purely administrative and rule-driven, and Debshankar’s case demonstrates how procedures are applied uniformly — without exception.
As one neighbour remarked, “If every official worked like this, there would be no doubts about elections.”
61
Published: Jan 16, 2026