Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
The Supreme Court has stepped in to halt a proposed eviction drive involving Scheduled Caste Hindu families who migrated to India from Pakistan, stressing that the grant of citizenship is incomplete without ensuring dignified housing. Taking serious note of the situation, the apex court directed the government to file a detailed response within four weeks and ordered that no eviction or displacement action be carried out in the interim.
The matter came up before a bench comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Koteshwar Singh, which was hearing a plea related to the possible displacement of these families currently residing near the Signature Bridge in Delhi’s Majnu Ka Tila area. The court observed that while citizenship had been granted to many of these migrants, their basic right to shelter remained unaddressed, leaving them vulnerable to eviction and uncertainty.
During the hearing, the bench underscored that citizenship is not merely a legal status but must be accompanied by conditions that allow individuals to live with dignity. The judges noted that despite being formally recognised as Indian citizens, the affected residents continue to face the threat of being uprooted from their homes without a clear rehabilitation plan in place. Such a situation, the court indicated, runs contrary to the constitutional promise of equality and human dignity.
In its interim order, the Supreme Court restrained authorities from proceeding with any eviction drive or development activity that could result in the displacement of the residents until further directions are issued. The protection currently covers around 250 families, impacting more than 1,000 people, many of whom have been living in the area for years. The court made it clear that the status quo must be maintained until the government explains its position and outlines the steps it intends to take.
The case has drawn attention to the broader issue of rehabilitation and resettlement of Hindu migrants from Pakistan, many of whom belong to Scheduled Castes and fled religious persecution before moving to India. While successive governments have taken steps to regularise their status and grant citizenship, housing and basic amenities have remained persistent challenges for large sections of this community.
Legal observers note that the court’s remarks could have wider implications for similar cases across the country, where migrant families face eviction despite having legal residency or citizenship. By linking citizenship with dignified living conditions, the Supreme Court has reinforced the principle that fundamental rights do not end with documentation but extend to access to shelter and humane living standards.
The government has now been asked to place its response on record within four weeks, detailing its stance on rehabilitation, housing, and long-term solutions for the affected families. Until then, the court’s interim relief offers temporary security to the residents, who have been living under the constant fear of displacement.
The matter remains under judicial consideration, and further hearings are expected once the government submits its reply. The outcome could shape future policy approaches towards migrant rehabilitation and the responsibilities of the state once citizenship is granted.
59
Published: Feb 02, 2026