After Ashes Snicko Controversy, Mitchell Starc Urges ICC to Fund Uniform DRS

Australia fast bowler Mitchell Starc has urged the International Cricket Council to fund and implement a uniform Decision Review System (DRS) across international cricket, following controversy during the Ashes 2025.

The debate intensified after multiple disputed decisions during the Adelaide Test, where snickometer (Snicko) readings appeared inconsistent, leading to widespread criticism from players, pundits, and fans. Australia benefited from both contentious calls, further fuelling scrutiny over the reliability of the technology used.

One key incident involved Alex Carey, who survived a DRS appeal despite later admitting he may have edged the ball. Carey went on to score a century that significantly influenced the match. Another controversial moment came during England’s first innings when replays suggested a clear gap between bat and ball, yet Snicko indicated contact, resulting in a dismissal.

There were also instances where Steve Smith survived DRS appeals. Following one such decision, Starc was heard on the stump microphone saying that Snicko “needs to be sacked”.

Speaking to reporters after the match, Starc said the lack of consistency in DRS technology across series was frustrating for players, officials, and viewers alike. He argued that the ICC should take responsibility for funding and standardising the system.

“It’s frustrating for everyone — players, officials, broadcasters and viewers,” Starc said. “The officials rely on it, so why doesn’t the ICC pay for it? Why not have one provider across the board and use the same technology in every series? That would reduce confusion and frustration.”

Former England captain Michael Vaughan echoed similar concerns, calling on the ICC to invest in the best available technology. Speaking to the BBC, Vaughan said host broadcasters and home boards were unlikely to bear the cost, making ICC intervention essential.

“The ICC needs to look at itself in the mirror. Broadcasters already pay huge sums for rights, and home boards have their own financial pressures. The ICC should be paying for the best technology available,” Vaughan said.

The renewed criticism has reignited calls for a centrally funded, standardised DRS framework to ensure consistency and credibility in decision-making across international cricket.