Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
Newly released documents connected to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have triggered fresh political debate after an FBI summary referenced an alleged phone call involving former US President Donald Trump and a Florida police official in 2006. The files, made public under a bipartisan transparency law, describe claims that Trump contacted Palm Beach law enforcement shortly after Epstein’s first sex crime charges became public.
According to the FBI interview summary, a former Palm Beach police chief recalled receiving a call in which Trump allegedly expressed support for the investigation and suggested that Epstein’s behaviour was widely known within certain social circles. The document states that Trump reportedly told the officer that many people were aware of Epstein’s actions and described one of Epstein’s close associates in harsh terms. The account also suggested that Trump claimed he had once left a gathering after seeing teenagers present.
The contents of the files have drawn attention because they appear to contrast with Trump’s longstanding public statements that he was unaware of any illegal conduct linked to Epstein. However, officials emphasised that the Justice Department has not found independent evidence confirming that the alleged phone call took place. Authorities noted that many materials included in the Epstein-related releases consist of unverified recollections and should not be interpreted as confirmed facts without corroboration.
The White House responded to the controversy by reiterating that Trump had been transparent about previously knowing Epstein socially but had distanced himself from him years before Epstein’s first arrest. Officials said that any past contact does not indicate knowledge of criminal activity and maintained that Trump has consistently denied involvement in or awareness of wrongdoing.
The release of documents has also increased scrutiny on other political figures mentioned in the records. During a Senate hearing, a senior US official acknowledged visiting Epstein’s private Caribbean island years earlier but denied any misconduct, stating that he had minimal contact with the financier. Emails included in the files reportedly reference travel arrangements connected to that visit, though no criminal allegations were attached to the disclosure.
Epstein’s death in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges continues to fuel global attention and ongoing debate. The periodic release of investigative materials has repeatedly reignited discussions about the relationships between high-profile individuals and Epstein’s network.
Analysts say the latest disclosures highlight how historical interactions are being reassessed in light of newly released information, even when legal authorities caution that unverified claims should be treated carefully. As more records become public, political reactions and legal analysis are expected to intensify, with observers closely watching how the revelations shape public discourse surrounding accountability and transparency in international politics.
6
Published: 1h ago