Shopping cart
Your cart empty!
Terms of use dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Recusandae provident ullam aperiam quo ad non corrupti sit vel quam repellat ipsa quod sed, repellendus adipisci, ducimus ea modi odio assumenda.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Sequi, cum esse possimus officiis amet ea voluptatibus libero! Dolorum assumenda esse, deserunt ipsum ad iusto! Praesentium error nobis tenetur at, quis nostrum facere excepturi architecto totam.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Inventore, soluta alias eaque modi ipsum sint iusto fugiat vero velit rerum.
Do you agree to our terms? Sign up
In a major development, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to initiate a preliminary inquiry into alleged irregularities in government contracts in Arunachal Pradesh.
The case involves contracts reportedly worth ₹1,270 crore and has drawn national attention due to its connection with the family members of the state’s Chief Minister.
The inquiry will examine allegations that public works contracts were awarded to firms linked to Pema Khandu’s wife, mother, and nephew.
The court’s directive marks a significant step in investigating whether there was any conflict of interest or misuse of power in awarding these contracts.
The Supreme Court has asked the CBI to investigate contracts awarded and executed between November 2015 and 2025. The probe will focus on how these contracts were granted and whether due procedures were followed.
Authorities will also examine the execution of these projects to identify any irregularities.
The case reached the Supreme Court through a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Save Mon Region Federation.
The petition raised concerns over transparency and accountability in public works projects in the state, prompting judicial intervention.
The court has instructed the CBI to register a preliminary inquiry before deciding on further action. This step will involve gathering evidence, reviewing documents, and assessing whether a full-fledged investigation is required.
The findings of this inquiry will determine the next course of legal proceedings.
The case has significant political implications, as it involves allegations against individuals linked to a sitting Chief Minister. It also raises broader questions about governance, transparency, and accountability in public projects.
Observers believe the outcome of the probe could have a lasting impact on administrative practices in the region.
The Supreme Court’s directive highlights the importance of maintaining transparency in government contracts. It reinforces the role of investigative agencies in ensuring that public funds are used appropriately.
The case will be closely monitored as the investigation progresses.
13
Published: 3h ago