Row Erupts Over Hanuman Statue in Texas After MAGA Activist’s Remarks

A political controversy has emerged in the United States after a conservative activist criticised a towering statue of Lord Hanuman at a Hindu temple in Texas, triggering widespread backlash and debate over religious freedom and multiculturalism.

Carlos Turcios, a Texas-based activist associated with the MAGA movement, shared a video of the 90-foot statue at the Shri Ashtalakshmi Temple, Sugar Land near Houston. In his post, he questioned why such a monument exists in the United States and described it as evidence of demographic change driven by immigration.

His remarks sparked criticism online, with many users calling the comments insensitive and divisive.

Statue Symbolises Faith and Cultural Identity

The statue, known as Panchaloha Abhaya Hanuman, was unveiled in August 2024 and is recognised as the tallest Hanuman statue in North America.

Temple representatives and community members emphasised that the monument reflects the religious identity of Hindu Americans in the region. They noted that the temple complex was built through private donations and remains open to visitors of all backgrounds.

Supporters argue that the statue represents cultural heritage and spiritual devotion rather than any political statement.

Religious Monuments Common Across the US

Large religious structures are not unusual in the United States, where communities construct prominent symbols of faith, including churches, Buddhist temples, synagogues, and large crosses.

In this context, supporters say the Hanuman statue reflects religious pluralism and the country’s long tradition of accommodating diverse faith communities.

Previous Statements Draw Scrutiny

The controversy also renewed attention to Turcios’ earlier social media posts critical of immigration and minority communities. Past posts included criticism of H-1B visa workers and warnings about demographic changes in Texas cities.

His comments have been criticised by community members and civil rights advocates who argue that such rhetoric fuels division and misrepresents immigrant contributions to American society.

Online Reaction and Community Response

Indian-American voices and interfaith groups defended the temple, highlighting that religious expression is protected under the US Constitution.

Supporters emphasised that immigrant communities have long contributed to American cultural and economic life and that religious landmarks from various traditions exist nationwide.

Debate Highlights Multicultural Identity

The episode has reignited discussions around immigration, cultural diversity, and religious freedom in the United States. While critics view the statue through a political lens, supporters frame it as an expression of faith and cultural belonging.

As the debate continues online, the controversy underscores the broader conversation about pluralism and coexistence in multicultural societies.