Mark Zuckerberg Defends Meta at Social Media Addiction Trial in Los Angeles

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta Platforms, testified in a Los Angeles courtroom as part of a landmark trial examining whether social media platforms deliberately addict and harm young users. The case is being closely watched as it could shape future litigation and regulation of digital platforms.

The lawsuit centers on claims by a now 20-year-old plaintiff, identified by initials, who alleges that early exposure to social media contributed to addiction-like behavior, depression, and suicidal thoughts. Meta and Google’s YouTube remain defendants in the case after other platforms reached settlements.

Meta Rejects Claims of Exploiting Vulnerable Users

During questioning, Zuckerberg rejected suggestions that Meta exploits vulnerable users. When presented with the idea that companies can help, ignore, or prey upon vulnerable people, he responded that a responsible company should aim to support its users.

Meta has consistently maintained that its platforms are designed to provide value and connection rather than cause harm.

Debate Over Youth Safety and Platform Policies

The testimony focused heavily on youth safety measures and age verification policies on platforms such as Instagram. Zuckerberg reiterated that the company restricts users under 13 and works to detect false age entries.

He said Meta continues to invest in tools and systems designed to identify underage users and enhance safety protections.

Questions on Authenticity and Public Image

Attorneys also questioned Zuckerberg about media training and internal feedback encouraging him to appear “authentic” and avoid sounding robotic. He pushed back against claims of coaching, describing such feedback as general communication advice.

Zuckerberg acknowledged that public speaking has not always been his strength and noted he is widely known for being uncomfortable in media appearances.

Wealth, Philanthropy, and Responsibility

During testimony, Zuckerberg said he has pledged to give away most of his wealth to charitable causes, particularly scientific research. When asked about compensation for victims affected by social media, he disagreed with the framing of the question.

Case Could Shape Future Lawsuits

This trial is considered a bellwether case, meaning its outcome could influence thousands of similar lawsuits involving social media platforms and youth mental health.

Meta’s legal team argued that while the plaintiff experienced mental health challenges, the platform was not a primary cause. Defense attorneys suggested she may have used social media as a coping mechanism rather than being harmed by it.

Wider Scrutiny of Social Media Impact

The case comes amid growing global scrutiny of social media’s impact on young users. Earlier testimony from Adam Mosseri, head of Instagram, stated that the platform does not aim to harm users and that long-term business success depends on user well-being.

Issues expected to be examined further include algorithm design, infinite scrolling features, and appearance-altering filters — all of which plaintiffs argue may encourage excessive usage.

A Defining Moment for the Tech Industry

Zuckerberg’s testimony marks one of the first times he has addressed such claims before a jury. The outcome may influence future regulations, corporate responsibility standards, and safety requirements for social media companies.

As legal scrutiny intensifies, the trial underscores the growing global debate over technology’s role in mental health, youth safety, and digital responsibility.