Bittu Bajrangi Files FIR Over Alleged Wedding Fraud, Accused Denies Claims

Bittu Bajrangi, also known as Rajkumar Panchal, has filed a police complaint alleging that he was cheated of Rs 30,000 under the pretext of arranging his marriage. The matter has now taken a new turn, with the accused publicly denying the allegations and presenting a counter-claim.

An FIR has been registered based on Bajrangi’s complaint, naming multiple individuals. Speaking about the case, Bajrangi alleged that certain officials were attempting to suppress the matter and said he has approached senior authorities seeking a detailed and impartial investigation.

He has demanded that both parties be questioned face-to-face to establish the facts clearly.

Allegations in the Complaint

According to the complaint, Bajrangi had approached a man identified as Bunty, said to be related to his neighbour, to help find a suitable bride. Bunty allegedly introduced him to a woman named Rani, who then arranged meetings with prospective matches in Aligarh.

After reportedly rejecting a few proposals, Bajrangi claimed he agreed to marry a woman whose photograph was shared with him. On September 5, 2025, the woman and her family allegedly visited Bajrangi’s home, and the wedding was fixed for February 7.

As per the complaint, Bajrangi agreed to pay Rs 1.20 lakh for wedding arrangements. He claims to have transferred Rs 30,000 on February 6 for purchasing clothes for the bride.

However, when he reached Aligarh with his wedding procession, he alleged that the accused were unreachable and had switched off their phones. Bajrangi stated that upon contacting the woman, she denied knowledge of any wedding arrangement, forcing him to return without the ceremony taking place.

Accused Responds with Counter Allegation

One of the accused, identified as Pankaj, has denied the fraud allegations. At a press conference, he stated that neither he nor Bunty accepted any money from Bajrangi.

Pankaj further alleged that Bajrangi had misled the prospective bride by sending a photograph of his late brother instead of his own. According to him, the woman initially agreed to the match based on that photograph but refused to proceed once she discovered the alleged misrepresentation.

He also claimed that only Rs 3,000 was transferred by Bajrangi to the bride’s brother to cover travel expenses during preliminary discussions. Pankaj maintained that he and Bunty were not involved in any financial dealings.

Investigation Underway

Bajrangi has denied misleading the bride and stated that her family had visited his residence, leaving no scope for misrepresentation. He described the incident as an attempt to defame him and expressed readiness to cooperate with investigators.

The case is currently under investigation, and authorities are expected to examine financial records, communication details, and statements from both sides to determine the facts.