Galgotias University Clarifies Robodog Row at India AI Impact Summit

Galgotias University has issued a clarification after facing online criticism over claims that it showcased a Chinese-made robotic dog as its own innovation at the India AI Impact Summit in New Delhi. The Greater Noida-based institution stated that it never claimed to have developed the robot and that the device was displayed solely as a learning tool for students.

The controversy erupted after a video from the summit went viral on social media, alleging that the university presented the robotic dog under the name “Orion” as an indigenous development. The robot was identified online as the Unitree Go2, an AI-powered robotic dog manufactured by Chinese robotics company Unitree and available commercially.

Responding to the backlash, the university said the robot had been procured to provide hands-on learning opportunities and exposure to advanced robotics technology. In a public statement, the institution emphasised that the device serves as a “classroom in motion,” enabling students to experiment, test capabilities and deepen their understanding of artificial intelligence and robotics.

The university further clarified that it had not built the robotic dog and had never officially claimed ownership of its development. It stated that acquiring advanced technology from global sources is part of its broader mission to ensure students remain ahead of emerging technological trends.

However, the clarification itself sparked further debate online. A community fact-check note circulating on social media claimed that the robot had been presented as a university-developed innovation during demonstrations at the summit. Critics pointed to a clip in which a representative described the robotic dog while referring to it by the name “Orion,” leading to allegations of misrepresentation.

The university maintained that innovation and learning should not be limited by geographical boundaries. It said institutions must provide students with exposure to the world’s best technologies to prepare them for real-world challenges.

Officials stated that the institution has consistently introduced cutting-edge technologies from global innovation hubs, including the United States, China and Singapore, to enhance practical learning and research.

The viral video at the centre of the controversy shows a presenter explaining the robot’s features during a media interaction, which critics interpreted as a claim of indigenous development. This interpretation fueled widespread debate about academic transparency and the importance of clearly distinguishing between imported technology and in-house innovation.

In its response, the university stressed that its goal is to inspire students to explore advanced technologies, question existing systems and build improved solutions. It reiterated that exposure to global technology platforms is intended to empower students to develop world-class innovations from India.

The episode has sparked broader conversations about technology adoption, academic integrity and the role of global collaboration in education as India continues to position itself as a leader in artificial intelligence and robotics.