Iran Yet to Accept US Red Lines, JD Vance Says Military Option Remains

The United States and Iran remain divided following the latest round of indirect nuclear negotiations in Geneva, with US Vice President JD Vance stating that Tehran has not accepted key conditions set by President Donald Trump for a diplomatic breakthrough.

Speaking after the talks, Vance described the outcome as mixed. He noted that while both sides agreed to continue discussions, Iran has yet to acknowledge what he described as the administration’s “red lines,” which Washington considers essential for any agreement.

His remarks highlight the fragile state of diplomacy surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme, an issue that has remained a central security concern for the United States and its allies.

Vance emphasised that Washington continues to prefer a diplomatic solution. However, he reiterated that all options remain on the table if negotiations fail to produce results.

He also indicated that the decision on how long diplomacy should continue ultimately rests with President Trump. According to Vance, negotiations will proceed, but the administration retains the authority to determine when diplomatic efforts have reached their limit.

US officials said the Geneva discussions produced some progress but acknowledged that significant differences remain. Washington expects Iran to present more detailed proposals in the coming weeks in an effort to narrow gaps and clarify its positions.

The talks come at a sensitive moment, as tensions remain elevated over Iran’s nuclear activities. Trump has repeatedly warned that failure to agree to strict limitations could lead to serious consequences, including potential military action.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi expressed cautious optimism following the negotiations, stating that a new window has opened for reaching a sustainable agreement. He said Tehran hopes diplomacy will produce a solution that serves regional stability and the interests of all parties involved.

At the same time, Iranian officials have stressed that the country remains prepared to defend itself against any threat. They warned that any military action could have broader regional implications.

The negotiations are being mediated through diplomatic channels with Oman playing a key role as facilitator. The current round builds on earlier talks held this month, as both sides attempt to find common ground.

Observers note that the parallel pursuit of diplomacy and military preparedness reflects a strategic balancing act. While the United States seeks to limit Iran’s nuclear capabilities through negotiation, it continues to maintain deterrence measures in the region.

As discussions continue, the outcome of the negotiations will play a crucial role in shaping regional security dynamics, global non-proliferation efforts and future US–Iran relations.